Bonus Tutorial 8: Comparing Satellite Products With In Situ Data

Bonus Tutorial 8: Comparing Satellite Products With In Situ Data#

Week 1, Day 3, Remote Sensing

Content creators: Douglas Rao

Content reviewers: Katrina Dobson, Younkap Nina Duplex, Maria Gonzalez, Will Gregory, Nahid Hasan, Paul Heubel, Sherry Mi, Beatriz Cosenza Muralles, Jenna Pearson, Agustina Pesce, Chi Zhang, Ohad Zivan

Content editors: Paul Heubel, Jenna Pearson, Chi Zhang, Ohad Zivan

Production editors: Wesley Banfield, Paul Heubel, Jenna Pearson, Konstantine Tsafatinos, Chi Zhang, Ohad Zivan

Our 2024 Sponsors: CMIP, NFDI4Earth

Tutorial Objectives#

Estimated timing of tutorial: 25 minutes

In this bonus tutorial, our primary focus will be on the ‘Verification of Satellite Data’. Building on our previous modules where we explored various climate applications of satellite data, we will now delve into the critical task of assessing the quality and reliability of such data.

By the end of this tutorial, you will learn how to use land-based observations to validate satellite climate data. In this process, you will learn how to:

access the gridded climate data derived from station observations from AWS.
convert monthly total values to a daily rate.
correctly evaluate satellite data against land-based observations.

Setup#

# installations ( run this cell ONLY when using google colab or kaggle )

# !pip install s3fs --quiet

# # properly install cartopy in colab to avoid session crash
# !apt-get install libproj-dev proj-data proj-bin --quiet
# !apt-get install libgeos-dev --quiet
# !pip install cython --quiet
# !pip install cartopy --quiet

# !apt-get -qq install python-cartopy python3-cartopy  --quiet
# !pip uninstall -y shapely  --quiet
# !pip install shapely --no-binary shapely  --quiet

# !pip install boto3 --quiet

# you may need to restart the runtime after running this cell and that is ok

# imports
import s3fs
import xarray as xr
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import cartopy.crs as ccrs
import pooch
import os
import tempfile
import boto3
import botocore
from scipy import stats

Install and import feedback gadget#

[notice] A new release of pip is available: 24.2 -> 24.3.1
[notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip

Figure settings#

Helper functions#

Video 1: Verification of Satellite Data#

Submit your feedback#

If you want to download the slides: https://osf.io/download/w3r49/

Submit your feedback#

Section 1: Evaluating Satellite Data with Observations#

Satellite data is frequently cross-verified against observations deemed reliable to evaluate its quality. Station-based observations and derived data are typically regarded as reliable references. When it comes to oceanic data, measurements taken by ships, buoys, drifters, or gliders are often used as a benchmark to assess the quality of satellite data.

In this tutorial, we will be using the nClimGrid dataset, a gridded climate dataset produced by NOAA. This dataset provides daily and monthly temperature and precipitation data, leveraging all available station observations. However, it’s important to note that this dataset is exclusive to the United States. We have selected this dataset due to its public availability on AWS. You are encouraged to explore other station data for the evaluation of satellite data in your projects.

Section 1.2: Read GPCP Monthly Precipitation Data#

Now we are ready to compare our land-based observations to the monthly GPCP satellite from AWS public data catalog.

# get the list of all data files in the AWS S3 bucket
fs = s3fs.S3FileSystem(anon=True)
file_pattern = "noaa-cdr-precip-gpcp-monthly-pds/data/*/gpcp_v02r03_monthly_*.nc"
file_location = fs.glob(file_pattern)

# open connection to all data files
file_ob = [
    pooch_load(filelocation="http://s3.amazonaws.com/" + file, filename=file)
    for file in file_location
]

# open all the monthly data files and concatenate them along the time dimension.
# this process will take ~ 1 minute to complete due to the number of data files.
ds_gpcp = xr.open_mfdataset(file_ob, combine="nested", concat_dim="time")
ds_gpcp

<xarray.Dataset> Size: 46MB
Dimensions:       (latitude: 72, longitude: 144, time: 540, nv: 2)
Coordinates:
  * latitude      (latitude) float32 288B -88.75 -86.25 -83.75 ... 86.25 88.75
  * longitude     (longitude) float32 576B 1.25 3.75 6.25 ... 353.8 356.2 358.8
  * time          (time) datetime64[ns] 4kB 1979-01-01 1979-02-01 ... 2023-12-01
Dimensions without coordinates: nv
Data variables:
    lat_bounds    (time, latitude, nv) float32 311kB dask.array<chunksize=(1, 72, 2), meta=np.ndarray>
    lon_bounds    (time, longitude, nv) float32 622kB dask.array<chunksize=(1, 144, 2), meta=np.ndarray>
    time_bounds   (time, nv) datetime64[ns] 9kB dask.array<chunksize=(1, 2), meta=np.ndarray>
    precip        (time, latitude, longitude) float32 22MB dask.array<chunksize=(1, 72, 144), meta=np.ndarray>
    precip_error  (time, latitude, longitude) float32 22MB dask.array<chunksize=(1, 72, 144), meta=np.ndarray>
Attributes: (12/45)
    Conventions:                CF-1.6, ACDD 1.3
    title:                      Global Precipitation Climatatology Project (G...
    source:                     oc.197901.sg
    references:                 Huffman et al. 1997, http://dx.doi.org/10.117...
    history:                    1) �R`�, Dr. Jian-Jian Wang, U of Maryland,...
    Metadata_Conventions:       CF-1.6, Unidata Dataset Discovery v1.0, NOAA ...
    ...                         ...
    metadata_link:              gov.noaa.ncdc:C00979
    product_version:            v23rB1
    platform:                   NOAA POES (Polar Orbiting Environmental Satel...
    sensor:                     AVHRR>Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer
    spatial_resolution:         2.5 degree
    comment:                    Processing computer: eagle2.umd.edu

# get the GPCP precipitation rate
prcp_sat = ds_gpcp.precip
prcp_sat

<xarray.DataArray 'precip' (time: 540, latitude: 72, longitude: 144)> Size: 22MB
dask.array<concatenate, shape=(540, 72, 144), dtype=float32, chunksize=(1, 72, 144), chunktype=numpy.ndarray>
Coordinates:
  * latitude   (latitude) float32 288B -88.75 -86.25 -83.75 ... 86.25 88.75
  * longitude  (longitude) float32 576B 1.25 3.75 6.25 ... 353.8 356.2 358.8
  * time       (time) datetime64[ns] 4kB 1979-01-01 1979-02-01 ... 2023-12-01
Attributes:
    long_name:      NOAA Climate Data Record (CDR) of GPCP Monthly Satellite-...
    standard_name:  precipitation amount
    units:          mm/day
    valid_range:    [  0. 100.]
    cell_methods:   area: mean time: mean

Section 1.3: Spatial Pattern#

Now, let’s take a quick look at the spatial pattern between these two datasets for a selected month (e.g., 1979-01-01).

# set up the geographical region for continental US
central_lat = 37.5
central_lon = -96
extent = [-120, -70, 21, 50]
central_lon = np.mean(extent[:2])
central_lat = np.mean(extent[2:])

# extract sat and obs data for the month of 1979-01-01
sat = prcp_sat.sel(time="1979-01-01")
obs = obs_rate.sel(time="1979-01-01")

# initiate plot for North America using two suplots
fig, axs = plt.subplots(
    2,
    subplot_kw={"projection": ccrs.AlbersEqualArea(central_lon, central_lat)},
    figsize=(9, 12),
    sharex=True,
    sharey=True,
)
axs[0].set_extent(extent)
axs[0].coastlines()
axs[0].set_title("GPCP Monthly")
sat.plot(
    ax=axs[0],
    transform=ccrs.PlateCarree(),
    vmin=0,
    vmax=15,
    cbar_kwargs=dict(shrink=0.5, label="GPCP Precipitation (mm/day)"),
)
axs[1].set_extent(extent)
axs[1].coastlines()
axs[1].set_title("nClimGrid Monthly")
obs.plot(
    ax=axs[1],
    transform=ccrs.PlateCarree(),
    vmin=0,
    vmax=15,
    cbar_kwargs=dict(shrink=0.5, label="nClimGrid Precipitation (mm/day)"),
)

<cartopy.mpl.geocollection.GeoQuadMesh at 0x7f56d2b93d30>

/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.9.20/x64/lib/python3.9/site-packages/cartopy/io/__init__.py:241: DownloadWarning: Downloading: https://naturalearth.s3.amazonaws.com/50m_physical/ne_50m_coastline.zip
  warnings.warn(f'Downloading: {url}', DownloadWarning)

../../../_images/1c39635118de6bf869f08dbc4b705869b44fa11cb3d1d3c0349f64d8a3aa40e2.png

Overall, we have a similar spatial pattern but with widely different spatial resolution (i.e., 5km v.s. 2.5°).

Section 1.4: Time Series Comparison#

Let’s use New York City as an example, we can examine the time series of the satellite and observation-based dataset to evaluate the performance.

The latitute and longitute of NYC is (40.71°N, 74.01°W). We will use it to extract the time series from GPCP and nClimGrid using the nearest method you discussed in Day 1 due to the differing resolutions of each dataset.

# note that GPCP data is stored as 0-360 degree for the longitude, so the longitude should be using (360 - lon)
sat = prcp_sat.sel(longitude=285.99, latitude=40.71, method="nearest")
obs = obs_rate.sel(lon=-74.01, lat=40.71, method="nearest")  # precipitation rate
obs_total = prcp_obs.sel(lon=-74.01, lat=40.71, method="nearest")  # total amount

# let's look at the comparison between the precipitation rate from nClimGrid and satellite CDR
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
obs.plot(label="nClimGrid Monthly Precipitation Rate", ax=ax)
sat.plot(color="k", alpha=0.6, label="GPCP Monthly Precipitation Rate", ax=ax)
ax.set_ylabel("nClimGrid v.s. GPCP (New York City) (mm/day)")
ax.legend()

<matplotlib.legend.Legend at 0x7f56d2910820>

../../../_images/beb471cba1a9fd48c8182bfc7810a2b4e04b9346205f77fbd3123560a114f22b.png

Now we are going to zoom in to a few years to see how the data compares.

fig, ax = plt.subplots()
# select 2011 to 2015 slice
obs.sel(time=slice("2011-01-01", "2015-12-01")).plot(label="nClimGrid", ax=ax)
sat.sel(time=slice("2011-01-01", "2015-12-01")).plot(marker="o", label="GPCP Monthly", ax=ax)
# aesthetics
ax.set_xlabel("Time (months)")
ax.set_ylabel("Precipitation (mm/day)")
ax.set_title("New York City – 2011-2015")
ax.legend()

<matplotlib.legend.Legend at 0x7f56d11bf8b0>

../../../_images/fa73cea852f21025361d01268c21c431b217d5f90f14fd727cee1e2d64443393.png

We see a great alignment in the precipitation rate between the nClimGrid and GPCP data when we look at the details over this small chosen window. However, we cannot zoom in to every location for all times to confirm they are a good match. We can use statistics to quantify the relationship between these two datasets for as in a automated fashion, and will do so in the next section.

Section 1.5: Quantify the Difference#

One way to more robustly compare the datasets is through a scatterplot. The data would ideally follow the 1:1 line, which would suggest that they are very closely matched. Let’s make this plot and observe how our data compares to one another:

# make sure that both observation and satellite data are for the samte time period
sat = sat.sel(time=slice("1979-01-01", "2022-12-01"))
obs = obs.sel(time=slice("1979-01-01", "2022-12-01"))

# plot the scatter plot between nClimGrid and GPCP monthly precipitation CDR
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
fig.suptitle("GPCP Precipitation v.s. nClimGrid")

# scatter data
ax.scatter(sat, obs, alpha=0.6)

# aesthetics
y_lim = (0, 15)
x_lim = (0, 15)
ax.plot((0, 15), (0, 15), "r-") # Add 1:1 line
ax.set_ylim(y_lim)
ax.set_xlim(x_lim)
ax.set_xlabel("GPCP Precipitation (mm/day)")
ax.set_ylabel("nClimGrid (mm/day)")

Text(0, 0.5, 'nClimGrid (mm/day)')

../../../_images/f1dfb30e7c7e5c1837666784a9ae489ceada0335c67fb14acae5e0b3d8f3f7d8.png

By eye, there appears to be a stong correlation between the satellite data and the observations for NYC, with much of the data following the 1:1 line plotted in red. As in the last tutorial, we can calculate the correlation coefficient and corresponding p-value.

r, p = stats.pearsonr(sat, obs)
print("Corr Coef: " + str(r) + ", p-val: " + str(p))

Corr Coef: 0.9071569149331669, p-val: 6.96862251125824e-200

Coding Exercises 1.5#

Sometimes, we are more interested in the difference among the anomaly data rather than the total data. Using the same location, compare the anomaly data.

# calculate climatology for the 1981-2010 period for both GPCP and nClimGrid
sat_clim = ...
obs_clim = ...

# calculate anomaly of the NYC time series for both GPCP and nClimGrid
sat_clim_anom = ...
obs_clim_anom = ...

# plot time series and scatter plot between two time series
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
# obs_clim_anom.sel(time=slice("2011-01-01", "2015-12-01")).plot(
#     label="nClimGrid anomaly", ax=ax
# )
# sat_clim_anom.sel(time=slice("2011-01-01", "2015-12-01")).plot(
#     marker="o", label="GPCP Monthly anomaly", ax=ax
# )
ax.legend()

# plot the scatter plot between nClimGrid and GPCP monthly precipitation CDR
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
fig.suptitle("GPCP Precipitaion v.s. nClimGrid")
# ax.scatter(sat_clim_anom, obs_clim_anom, alpha=0.6)
# Add 1:1 line
y_lim = (0, 15)
x_lim = (0, 15)
ax.plot((0, 15), (0, 15), "r-")
ax.set_ylim(y_lim)
ax.set_xlim(x_lim)
ax.set_xlabel("GPCP Precipitation anomaly (mm/day)")
ax.set_ylabel("nClimGrid anomaly (mm/day)")

# calculate and print correlation coefficient and p-value
# r, p = ...
# print("Corr Coef: " + str(r) + ", p-val: " + str(p))

/tmp/ipykernel_118467/1854925119.py:17: UserWarning: No artists with labels found to put in legend.  Note that artists whose label start with an underscore are ignored when legend() is called with no argument.
  ax.legend()

Text(0, 0.5, 'nClimGrid anomaly (mm/day)')

../../../_images/00296d9370af3498a8224157045466f92040722a53c35179af97ecd8be6d226a.png

../../../_images/b4671abe5b24973508d384bf7afecb66b592c5de631569a4cc98c521f492f2cd.png

Click for solution

Example output:

Submit your feedback#

Summary#

In this tutorial, you explored how to use station-based observations within the U.S. to evaluate satellite precipitation data. While this isn’t a global comparison, the methodology can be applied to other station or observation data you may wish to utilize.

When carrying out these comparisons, remember the following key points:

Ensure that both the satellite data and the observations represent the same quantity (for example, total precipitation amount versus precipitation rate).
Comparisons should be made for the same geolocation (or very near to it) and the same time period.
Be aware of potential spatial scale effects. Satellite data measures over a large area, whereas observations may be narrowly focused, particularly for elements that exhibit substantial spatial variability. This can lead to considerable uncertainty in the satellite data.

Resources#

Data from this tutorial can be accessed here and here.

Bonus Tutorial 8: Comparing Satellite Products With In Situ Data

Contents

Bonus Tutorial 8: Comparing Satellite Products With In Situ Data#

Tutorial Objectives#

Setup#

Install and import feedback gadget#

Figure settings#

Helper functions#

Video 1: Verification of Satellite Data#

Submit your feedback#

Submit your feedback#

Section 1: Evaluating Satellite Data with Observations#

Section 1.1: Accessing nClimGrid - a station-based gridded climate data#

Section 1.2: Read GPCP Monthly Precipitation Data#

Section 1.3: Spatial Pattern#

Section 1.4: Time Series Comparison#

Section 1.5: Quantify the Difference#

Coding Exercises 1.5#

Submit your feedback#

Summary#

Resources#